Drought, Leakage and “Forever Chemicals”: Is This Really How We Should Protect the Thames?
Drought, Leakage and “Forever Chemicals”: Is This Really How We Should Protect the Thames? When a river is at its lowest, that may be precisely the time when we should be most careful about what we put back into it. An interesting—and rather worrying—story appeared in The Guardian this morning. It concerns Thames Water's proposed Teddington Direct River Abstraction scheme, designed to help maintain London's water supplies during periods of drought. At first sight, the idea sounds quite clever. Take up to 75 million litres of water a day from the Thames. Transfer that water towards the Lee Valley reservoirs, where it can eventually become part of London's drinking-water supply. At the same time, replace the water removed from the river with highly treated wastewater from the Mogden sewage treatment works. The river level is maintained. London receives additional water. Wastewater is recycled rather than simply discarded. It sounds, superficially at least, rather...