The huge cost of carbon sequestration

 The most widely used mechanism to capture carbon dioxide from industrial processes is chemical absorption using amine solvents. Once absorbed the  carbon dioxide needs to be removed from the solvent and this requires heat, and the amount of energy required can break the economic feasibility of this process. Lots of energy is required for this process and it makes sense that this energy needs to be made renewably otherwise the amount of carbon dioxide produced from the power plant would exceed the amount being sequestered. So we need better ways to sequester the carbon or by using waste heat from other processes to power these reactions. At the moment the cost of sequestration is too high and new mechanisms need to be developed to drive the cost down and make the process of sequestration more economically viable.

The huge cost of carbon sequestration is being ignored A tonne of carbon dioxide captured uses enough energy to power the average UK home for 24 days myrenewableenergy.org/News.html
#ClimateEmergency #ClimateCrisis #environmental



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New photocatalyst made from an aerogel for more efficient hydrogen production

Spider webs near roads capture all types of Micro plastics and could be used for monitoring pollution

​ New artificial leaf can capture 100 times more carbon in normal conditions